Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spats (Space Technology Students' Society) IIT Kharagpur
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge into Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Spats (Space Technology Students' Society) IIT Kharagpur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article about a local student club at a university. The only references I could find, discounting copies of this article and self-published websites, were a couple of letters written by a member of the club and an account of a talk at the club by a noted space researcher, which by itself doesn't seem to grant sufficient notability for an article. ArglebargleIV (talk) 14:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge to IIT Kharagpur. Not notable enough to have its independent article. Salih (talk) 18:30, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 18:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Salih. Drawn Some (talk) 19:35, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:09, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete This is the most important of all Indian engineering universities, equivalent there to MIT. It is plausible that this organization might be notable as an exception, but I don;t see the references to prove it. DGG (talk) 00:50, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with IIT Kharagpur, since we have no reliable independent sources, though we can verify that the society exists. No prejudice against recreation if SPATS gains more mainstream coverage. Abecedare (talk) 02:05, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.